QUALITY OR QUANTITY?
Which is best to start forming a new habit?
This will be a long post as there is no way to summarise it without context. Also I’m useless at keeping things short. Sorry.
Scientific experiment, a class of student photographers are split into two groups. Quantity group, and quality group.
The quantity group would get an A* if by the end of the term they submitted 100 photos , B 90 photos, C 80 photos, D -60 photos.
The quality group had to submit only ONE photo to be graded. If they captured all aspects of the course into one photo they would get an A*. The image has to be PERFECT.
During the term, the quantity group took hundred of photos, experimenting in different light, composition, techniques. They practiced and learned from their mistakes. What went well, what worked better, they DEVELOPED and SHARPENED THEIR SKILLS AS PHOTOGRAPHERS and FOUND THEIR STYLE.
The quality group, sat. They read books, watched videos and learning material on how to get the PERFECT SHOT.
The quality group were so fixed on finding the best approach and perfection, they never got around to taking action.
The result, the quality perfectionist group ended up with one average photo to submit.
The quality group, we’re simply learning and educating themselves, through theory, without actually doing or practicing. They were (as described in the book) ‘in motion’…
The quantity group were actively practicing and doing, they were ‘in action’ overall, they produced much higher quality photos.
They are similar but also very different approaches.
When you are IN MOTION you are planning, strategising, learning, but there is NO ACTION. There is no action, so there is NO RESULT. However, that is not to say been IN MOTION is bad. Of course we need the theory, to begin with…. But we can learn quicker and develop better from been IN ACTION.
When you are IN ACTION, you will deliver an outcome. As traders, we have to TAKE ACTION in order to produce results. There is little point in been a theorist in trading. (Unless you sell a strategy lol immy)
So why do we go into the IN MOTION zone? Partly, we need it in the very beginning to have some form of starting point to take action. But, this book suggests those who remain IN MOTION are simply staying there out of fear of failure. Motion is a bit of a myth, it tricks you to believe you ARE PROGRESSING AND GETTING THINGS DONE. Eg demo trading too long or OTT analysis causing filtering absolutely every trade unless it is a 10/10.
It is easy to fall into the trap of motion. I am IN MOTION right now. I think this process of reading and making notes is helping me. When the reality is…. I am not placing one single trade whilst I am doing this process so I am not taking any action.
The difference is, I’m simply not trading whilst I am on holiday end of story. By choice, not out of fear…. Simply taking the opportunity to develop. But in a motion state.
Where I would consider MOTION state to be a hinderance, would be learning a totally different strategy or set of rules to the bannana or my current plan; by seeking for the perfect holy grail. When the reality is, all I need to do is stick to one but TAKE ACTION and take the setups over and over and over and over again.
This combines with the next point in the chapter….
IF YOU WANT TO MASTER A HABIT, THE KEY IS REPETITION, NOT PERFECTION.
Turning up every session. Doing your pre market checks. Taking every trade you believe is correct. Only trading in the correct direction you intend to trade. Documenting every trade. Over and over and over and over again.
Simply …. Get your reps in


Question? How long does it take to form a new habit ? (Or get good!?)
Answer: time is irrelevant.
Ask this instead…. How many TIMES does it take to form a good habit???
Now think about the perfectionists who took one photo…. With little practical experience to draw from. They probably knew it all in theory, but they felt the pressure, they were average performers.
Now you understand why the QUANTITY photography students out performed. They found the perfection in their journey of imperfections and mistakes. They learned what is ‘their style’ AKA… what is THEIR SETUP with an practical understanding of how they got there.
—————
Note to self.
Been IN MOTION is ok, there is a time and a place for it; but in order to see results and truly grown and develop we need to TAKE ACTION. Again and again and again.
The amount of time spent performing a habit is not as important as the amount of times you have performed it. (T20 challenge over and over)
As Minsk alluded to today, taking no trade is still taking a position.
I love that phrase… STILL TAKING A POSITION. Does that feed the ego of trading? Why sure it does…. I did not take a position..,, that sounds so much better than, ‘the markets were shit today.’
……Maybe I need to factor this into my session recording… Long, Short, BE or ‘capital protection position’ as an outcome for a filtered trade.
edit…
taking NO POSITION is an ACTIVE CHOICE, a DECISION WAS MADE.
I need to make the ‘craving’ of the markets be…
TAKING A DECISION, NOT TAKING A TRADE.
There is just as much an active thought process to not take a trade, than there is to take one…. So why should be ignore the hard work of not taking a trade?
I shall finished my session summaries with this when I return.
WHAT POSITIONS DID I TAKE TODAY?
Long, Short, L/S BE or No Position.
i just need a simple way of monitoring and rewarding good no trade decisions now.