Emma´s Challenge M5
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Phase 1 Trade 14
I was back to objectivity and i took this trade.
looks Valid to me
looks Valid to me
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
hmmm
I have a problem...
I missed this due to that i saw one pullback candle as being impulsive.
I dont know how i can find the balance between "just taking perfect signals" and "be to mechanical so it become stupid"
We have an example on both today on dax.
This one was valid.
and the one i took "trade 13" was too mechanical.
I missed this due to that i saw one pullback candle as being impulsive.
I dont know how i can find the balance between "just taking perfect signals" and "be to mechanical so it become stupid"
We have an example on both today on dax.
This one was valid.
and the one i took "trade 13" was too mechanical.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Re: Emma´s Challenge M5
Thank you DarrenRDarren wrote: 04 Oct 2022, 15:19 You are certainly not a horrible trader, but for me I would of liked a bit more of a momentum candle before the entry just to show the bias has returned to longs, rather than just a small break.

I agree. this was a weak break.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
- Minsk
- AIMSter
- Posts: 498
- Joined: 11 Nov 2021, 16:11
- 3
Re: Phase 1 Trade 14
it's sad it hits your Sl at BE and then goes up all the wayeaxh wrote: 04 Oct 2022, 18:15 I was back to objectivity and i took this trade.
looks Valid to me
trade 14.png
- Minsk
- AIMSter
- Posts: 498
- Joined: 11 Nov 2021, 16:11
- 3
Re: hmmm
if your rule is to filter this pullback as too impulsive you made the right decision. I would agree, too impulsive. And then it flies without you. It happens. I would not say you filtered for a wrong reason. It's just hindsight that makes you think you missed it.eaxh wrote: 04 Oct 2022, 18:23 I have a problem...
I missed this due to that i saw one pullback candle as being impulsive.
I dont know how i can find the balance between "just taking perfect signals" and "be to mechanical so it become stupid"
We have an example on both today on dax.
This one was valid.
and the one i took "trade 13" was too mechanical.04.10.2022_19.18.38_REC missed trade.png
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Phase 1 Trade 15
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Phase 1 Trade 16
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Phase 1 Trade 17
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning
- eaxh
- AIMSter
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 21:19
- 8
Phase 1 Trade 18 and 19
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Don't let the fear of losing keep you from winning