Bettina's Journal

[Bettina]

+ 17 on EU ( P5 )
- 10 on EJ ( didn't wait for P5, M5 and M15 gators were open down, but becoming narrower ) . Will try to avoid this in future.

[Bettina]

3 Trades, 2,24 % :
- 7.4 mistake, forgotten PO on GU
+16.9 and +16.5 on EU

[msk185]

Congratulations on your trades, for some reason I cant see any pictures, am I doing something wrong?

[Bettina]

This is only for Herbert !!!!!

I copied the entries from the chat room here on classic + DA VS wave count.

Herbert: classic setup with DA filtered by aims box +win/loss ratio VS. elliot counted setups not working + missed(17:06)
Herbert: probably, it WAS a wide question.... (17:06)
Herbert: i miss several setups because elliot count did not make sense....(17:07)

First spontanous answers :

1 ) DA : No setup, reminds me to look at HTF gator or eWaves, nothing else. We had that before:
- don't trade on the wrong side of the HTF ( next HTF ) wave
Now we have a reminder for HHTF also.
But it says only up or down and not which side of the wave ( which is equal to gator opening for me )

2 ) Classic setup after w3 mostly doesn't work after just one opposite cycle, DA right side or not. All of my loosers are of that kind. Mostly it's wave b. There are some, which work : very strong w3 on HTF, which doesn't even see the small 4 ( just one ZL cross ) on CTF.
If HTF starts to really retrace, then abc on CTF is necessary for a 5.
w1/2 might be different ( w2 is the one, I don't understand at all )

3 ) Best works a combination : ( Just my momentaneous status of brainwaves !!! )
a ) CTF : w4 having at least two opposite highs/lows with 2 ZL crosses ( very clear abc structure, can be P5 with 3 and 5, can be xx small and 3, can be 3 and truncated 5 )
b ) HTF same direction, falling side of it's wave but already very near ZL, can have crossed, but needn't
c ) HHTF : same direction and growing side of it's wave ( eWaves widely open and Lime or Red !!! ) : For me this is essentiel and the most important outcome since me thinking about arrows

Fazit :

Classic with DA
Pro : Some more immediate 5 of 3 ( beware of 5 of 5 )
Contra : Many wave b

eWave structure ( means essentially wait for abc ) :
Pro : Better w5s, no b
Contra : Sometimes problems with w1 and 2

This is for people, who don't love it simple, but deep and complete !
Bettina

[Bettina]

Congratulations on your trades, for some reason I cant see any pictures, am I doing something wrong?

Hi Mike,

no, you don't do anything wrong. I didn't publish any pictures, because I use different indicators and don't want to confuse people.
But the strategy is Aims strategy with eWaves and caring for the next 2 higher timeframe gators.

The EU winners were 14:23 and 16:19 UTC ( GMT +2 ) on m1.

Cheers
Bettina

[Bettina]

Here's a picture

[msk185]

Thank you, looks like I missed a lovely setup at 16.19

Mike

[Bettina]

For everybody who wonders where the dots are : I'm pretty sure, that nobody wants to see that !
It's one of my overview charts with very dense candles. I have others , which alert the dots of course

[Bettina]

This is only for Herbert !!!!!

Morning Herbert,
read the former post first.

These are the ones I would not take from a wave count perspective, if I were not already in it. Is it this kind, where you say, you'd miss so many ?
Have to watch, whether they work better, if it's really growing DA

Cheers
Bettina

[Herbert]

Bettina!!!
Thank-you for your highly defined and qualified answer. Let me digest in timely fashion. I always appreciate your views. Your progress and insight is stellar!!

I have decided to retrace my steps in AIMS as I have maybe gone past the 10sec elliot requirement.
I am currently digging myself back into classic setups after i have learned so much so far while peering into the AIMS kaleidoscope.

My chat-room exposure with Immy and DA's has shifted my attention from "10sec++++++ elliot" to a rediscovery of classic setups and DA qualified setups. Especially since i now attempt multiple pairs.

I have experienced "expectancy logic" not met to disconnect me from the NOW for periods, while under my nose a classic setup (and I refer to any DA qualified dot scenario as potential classic setup with a fog-horn attached), leads the way with way too much ease considering the extensive analysis i had to do and now have to dis-own.

"Hidden" in the original Chaos theory refined AIMS methodology, for me, there is already a design that seem to require minimal additional analysis with a 10sec Ewaves scan. (i intentionally changed 10sec elliot to 10sec Ewaves here, huge difference ) )

Of course P5 structures hold it's own identity and I follow them religiously as they appear.

NOTE: Reading your last post. Good morning Bettina! Especially lately with so many "truncated" w5's, tend to "stall" me.

Regards
Herbert