Dave from Sydney's Journal [Awarded Title: the Box-Trader]
- Dave
- AIMSter

- Posts: 865
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 06:05
- 13
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Thanks Darren, did the job!
Now, I choose to make a profit in trading.
- Dave
- AIMSter

- Posts: 865
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 06:05
- 13
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Hi everyone, I haven't posted for a while but I enjoyed the EJ move this evening. I've also thrown in a picture at the end that shows an important distinction between the types of stepping pattern I often refer to. Kris mentioned it to me the other day and it's such a simple concept, but one definitely worth highlighting and remembering.
Cya
Cya
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Now, I choose to make a profit in trading.
- Nikita
- AIMSter

- Posts: 435
- Joined: 19 Dec 2013, 15:04
- 11
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Very nice add-on company!
If you have time (or anybody else) could you please comment on destinction between the type of stepping patterns?
If you have time (or anybody else) could you please comment on destinction between the type of stepping patterns?
Who says we cannot predict, you can, thats not a problem, problem is how you react after you've predicted. (c) Immy
-
KrisL
- Free Member

- Posts: 97
- Joined: 14 Oct 2013, 01:33
- 12
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Hope Dave doesn't mind me jumping in here.
What he's referring to by the different stepping patterns is the "character" of price movement (in Elliot wave terms, the character of the wave). The difference is that one is clearly impulsive and the other is clearly corrective in nature. Some clues to the character of the wave:
Impulsive - gator wide open, price moving in steps that don't overlap each other, progress made in a certain direction
Corrective - gator looks sleepy, price moves in steps that overlap, there is an obvious lack of overall progress (that is, price moves in a sideways manner, or if it moves in one direction it does so without much conviction).
Hope that helps.
What he's referring to by the different stepping patterns is the "character" of price movement (in Elliot wave terms, the character of the wave). The difference is that one is clearly impulsive and the other is clearly corrective in nature. Some clues to the character of the wave:
Impulsive - gator wide open, price moving in steps that don't overlap each other, progress made in a certain direction
Corrective - gator looks sleepy, price moves in steps that overlap, there is an obvious lack of overall progress (that is, price moves in a sideways manner, or if it moves in one direction it does so without much conviction).
Hope that helps.
- Nikita
- AIMSter

- Posts: 435
- Joined: 19 Dec 2013, 15:04
- 11
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Thank you, Kris.
It helped a lot. I m just wondering, how this onfo could help us?
It helped a lot. I m just wondering, how this onfo could help us?
Who says we cannot predict, you can, thats not a problem, problem is how you react after you've predicted. (c) Immy
- Dave
- AIMSter

- Posts: 865
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 06:05
- 13
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Hi Nikita,
I suppose what I’m trying to highlight, and thanks to Kris for his explanation, is the visual difference between an impulsive wave and a corrective wave as displayed by the stepping pattern of the AIMS boxes.
Kris said it well, “progress made in a certain direction”, as shown by AIMS boxes that are stepping away from the zero line where the height of the box is greater than its width, or where the vertical movement of price is greater than the horizontal movement of time. That might sound a bit long winded, but it’s just saying that price is moving with impulsivity.
In contrast, an indication that we may be in a corrective wave is the shallower stepping pattern of the AIMS boxes, where we clearly see price drifting sideways rather than making progress in a certain direction.
These two wave characteristics can also be seen on the eWave, where we see a steep and sudden push away from the zero line (often developing into a wave 3/5) or a shallow and drawn out drift back towards the zero line (which may be wave 2/4).
The key point here is that we want to make entries into the next potential impulsive wave following a shallow AIMS box stepping pattern/shallow eWave retracement/corrective wave. We should therefore be more cautious about entries that, although away from the zero line, may be following a steeper AIMS box stepping pattern/steeper eWave retracement/more impulsive wave.
I suppose what I’m trying to highlight, and thanks to Kris for his explanation, is the visual difference between an impulsive wave and a corrective wave as displayed by the stepping pattern of the AIMS boxes.
Kris said it well, “progress made in a certain direction”, as shown by AIMS boxes that are stepping away from the zero line where the height of the box is greater than its width, or where the vertical movement of price is greater than the horizontal movement of time. That might sound a bit long winded, but it’s just saying that price is moving with impulsivity.
In contrast, an indication that we may be in a corrective wave is the shallower stepping pattern of the AIMS boxes, where we clearly see price drifting sideways rather than making progress in a certain direction.
These two wave characteristics can also be seen on the eWave, where we see a steep and sudden push away from the zero line (often developing into a wave 3/5) or a shallow and drawn out drift back towards the zero line (which may be wave 2/4).
The key point here is that we want to make entries into the next potential impulsive wave following a shallow AIMS box stepping pattern/shallow eWave retracement/corrective wave. We should therefore be more cautious about entries that, although away from the zero line, may be following a steeper AIMS box stepping pattern/steeper eWave retracement/more impulsive wave.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Dave on 13 Mar 2014, 00:06, edited 1 time in total.
Now, I choose to make a profit in trading.
- Darren
- Posts: 891
- Joined: 20 Nov 2012, 13:54
- 12
- Nikita
- AIMSter

- Posts: 435
- Joined: 19 Dec 2013, 15:04
- 11
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
Bull`s eye, Dave!
Thank you very much for that detailed explanation. (wd)
Thank you very much for that detailed explanation. (wd)
Who says we cannot predict, you can, thats not a problem, problem is how you react after you've predicted. (c) Immy
- Dave
- AIMSter

- Posts: 865
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 06:05
- 13
Re: Dave from Sydney's Journal
An evening of false starts but a positive result nonetheless, cya next week, enjoy the weekend everyone.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Now, I choose to make a profit in trading.
-
Silas
- Free Member

- Posts: 63
- Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 16:32
- 11